![]() ![]() Supreme Court Judge Elena Kagan to ask that Apple be forced to implement the anti-steering rule changes immediately. The appeals court gave Apple 90 days to make a filing with the Supreme Court, and said at that time that Apple did not need to change the rules until the Supreme Court made a decision on whether to hear the case.Īpple has not yet filed with the Supreme Court, but Epic Games made an emergency appeal with U.S. Apple then decided to request that the Supreme Court hear the case. In April 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the original court and kept the App Store rule change mandate in place. Since 2021, Apple has been able to delay implementing changes pending various appeals. Apple case that started in 2020, the judge decided that Apple should change its App Store rules to allow developers to direct customers to purchasing mechanisms outside of the App Store, which paves the way for alternate payment methods. Apple can maintain the App Store rules as is while the Supreme Court considers its appeal, according to Bloomberg Law.Īpple's anti-steering rules prevent developers from directing customers to make purchases for digital goods outside of the App Store. For now, the gaming community awaits the Supreme Court’s final stance.Apple does not need to change its "anti-steering" App Store rules while its legal dispute with Epic Games continues to play out, the U.S. As legal decisions unfold, they will undeniably shape how developers, platforms, and gamers interact in this new digital frontier. ![]() The ongoing tussle between Epic Games and Apple is emblematic of broader shifts and challenges in the digital domain, especially as NFTs and Web3 gaming become more mainstream. The Play Store by Google or the expanding range of blockchain games hosted by Epic Games might become more enticing platforms for such endeavours. Given these constraints on Apple’s ecosystem, gamers might have to look elsewhere to enjoy a comprehensive NFT gaming experience. Were the Supreme Court to ultimately favour Epic, a new horizon could emerge where apps can link users to external NFT platforms, bypassing Apple’s 30% commission. ![]() Apple enforces regulations on its platform to shield iOS users from the financial uncertainties inherent in virtual assets such as cryptocurrencies and NFTs.Ĭurrently, mobile games employing NFTs and cryptocurrency tokens won’t be able to guide users to external marketplaces because of Apple’s prevailing rules. This news undoubtedly sent waves of excitement throughout the Web3 gaming community.Īpple’s AppStore guidelines have frequently faced criticism for hindering Web3 entities. In June, leading web3 game developer and publisher, Immutable Games, revealed that Gods Unchained, Ethereum’s top-selling trading card game, debuted on the Epic Games Store. What Does This Mean for NFTs, Web3 Gaming, and Apple? ![]() On the other hand, Epic’s stance was that the 9th Circuit’s criteria for postponing injunctions are too permissive. Apple argued that enforcing the injunction would oblige it to alter its business model, potentially compromising user protection against potential threats like fraud, scams, and malware. This means that, for the moment, the judicial system has allowed Apple’s existing regulations to persist. Supreme Court, represented by Justice Elena Kagan, declined to override the 9th Circuit’s decision to suspend the injunction. Fast forward to recent events, and the U.S. However, this decision was temporarily halted in July. Circuit Court of Appeals played a critical role by initially upholding the injunction. The consequential injunction mandated Apple to allow developers to include links and buttons directing users to alternate payment systems within their apps Specifically, Apple’s policy prohibiting developers from “steering” users to alternative digital purchasing methods, which could potentially save them money, was pinpointed as unfair. While Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers turned down Epic’s antitrust allegations against Apple in 2021, she ruled that Apple transgressed California’s unfair competition laws. □1/3 /UnpnphgapG- Florian Mueller August 9, 2023 matters are assigned) denied Epic Games' motion to enforce the injunction it won in district court 2 years ago.Įpic was right legal standard favored Apple. Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court (by decision of Justice Kagan, who is the SCOTUS judge to whom such 9th Cir. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |